Crystal L. Cox FIGHTS Back. Crystal Cox Files a Lawsuit against Montana Forensics Engineer Scott Curry, CBIC Insurance, BJCC Inspections, Whitefish Credit Union, Mike Workman, C21 Eureka Montana, First American Title, Ron Nelson, Nelson Construction Eureka Montana, Antonich Adjusters, Noel Appraisals, Abel Engineering, NMAR, Kathy Schulte Kalispell, J. Tiffin Hall, Tiffin Hall Law Office, Alleging Fraud, Breach of Contract, Intentional Misrepresentation, Civil Conspiracy, Consumer Protection Act, Truth in Lending, Fraud, Negligence, Violation of Civil Rights, Breach of Care, RESPA, Montana Credit Union Act, Toxic Mold Safety and Protection Act of 2002, and Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing.

Click Arrow to Read Full Document

Link to Full Page Document
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiUHJrLVZ0Q0tvMlk/edit

AND



NMAR, MLS Number  316256


Public NOTICE on Eureka Montana Real Estate Drumlin Lane

Posted Here Upon Knowledge and Belief of Montana Real Estate Broker, 

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.

Independent MEDIA, Citizen Journalist, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox FILES Anti-Trust Lawsuit against Forbes, Kashmir HIll, David Carr, New York Times, WIPO, Marc J. Randazza, Tracy Coenen, Peter L. Michaelson ...

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox v. Kashmir Hill Forbes Reporter 

Northern California Case 4:13-cv-02046-DMR

 
Anti-Trust Lawsuit Cox v Kashmir Hill, Forbes -

Port Townsend Washington can and SHOULD pass an Environmental Bill of Rights. Port Townsend Washington Environmental Bill of Rights ~ the TIME has Come. Time for the RESIDENTS of Port Townsend to STEP up and MAKE Law that STANDS up for their Rights to Clean Air and Clean Water per the Clean Air Act, and the Clean Water Act.

Port Townsend Washington Residents have a RIGHT to Clean Air, Water and Soil and to act responsible on what is leaving the County, such as TOXIC SLUDGE.

TIME for a PORT TOWNSEND BILL OF RIGHTS

"corporations and their leadership do not have special privileges 

or powers under the law that supersede the community’s rights."

Santa Monica City Council passes environmental bill of rights.

"CITY HALL — The City Council approved a unique law this week that enshrined the rights of the environment and residents’ rights to clean air and water.

The ordinance, known as the Sustainability Bill of Rights, asserts that corporations and their leadership do not have special privileges or powers under the law that supersede the community’s rights.
It also requires that the Office of Sustainability and the Environment prepare a report every two years documenting progress on the Sustainable City Plan, an effort begun in the mid-1990s to create benchmarks and goals to make Santa Monica more environmentally friendly, and that City Hall hold a public hearing.

Finally, and perhaps most controversially, some believe that the law gives residents the ability to sue a polluter themselves when one of those rights are violated, without waiting for City Hall or other agencies to get the ball rolling.

The ordinance was, in Councilmember Kevin McKeown’s words, a fundamental power shift away from business interests and toward the community that has not yet happened in the environmental movement.
“Unrestrained capitalism has extracted the good out of our environment in many, many cases. Here, for the first time, we as a city are taking a stand and saying we’re not going to let that happen anymore,” McKeown said.

The Sustainability Bill of Rights emerged from the Task Force on the Environment — consisting of a group of residents — after the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, which further cemented the rights of corporations as individuals in American law. The court’s decision opened the doors to unlimited campaign spending on behalf of companies.

The law was also a reaction to the spread of fracking, a process of extracting fossil fuels from the ground that many environmentalists say is extremely damaging to the environment, poisoning groundwater and even causing earthquakes.

The City Council approved a resolution in January 2012 backing the concept of the Sustainability Bill of Rights, but the resolution had no teeth. Those in support of the law passed Tuesday feel the City Council’s vote changed that.

“The fact that it establishes individual environmental rights is very important,” said Mark Gold, former president of nonprofit Heal the Bay and associate director of the UCLA Institute of the Environment and Sustainability.

Gold has spent much of his career fighting to save the environment from the negative impacts of human habitation on the Santa Monica Bay and other water ecosystems.

His primary tool was the Clean Water Act, a 1972 federal law that regulates quality standards for surface water, but the law lost effectiveness and involved arcane measurements that were difficult for members of the public to understand.

This ordinance finds strength in its return to basic environmental roots, Gold said.

Supporters of the Sustainability Bill of Rights believe that the law gives them the ability to sue polluters in court if City Hall does not do so. That could include what some call  Santa Monica’s “groundwater wars,” with over a decade spent in court to get companies to clean up dangerous chemicals that had leached into the groundwater through buried gasoline storage tanks.

“That legal standing did not exist before,” said Cris Gutierrez, a member of the Task Force on the Environment.

It was carefully-crafted to prevent abuse, and cannot be used to protect every street tree or stop every development in the city, Gold said.

“The ability of an individual to sue the city because they don’t like a development approval, that’s not in there,” Gold said.

Whether residents will be able to file any kind of lawsuit may be up to the courts to decide.

Jeff Caufield, an environmental attorney with the Los Angeles firm Caufield & James, thought there might be some conflict if a resident filed a private suit or acted as “a private attorney general.”

“It will likely need to be litigated and a decision made by a court on this particular ordinance and language,” Caufield said.

In the meantime, Gold hopes that the ordinance will keep the environment front and center for policy makers, and be a model for other cities who want to take a stand on the environment.

“There is a precedent-setting nature to this that the city is very aware of,” Gold said."

Source of Posthttp://smdp.com/city-council-passes-environmental-bill-of-rights/119705

This is amazing, a HUGE precedence. Communities EVERYWHERE should take this example and stand up for your RIGHT to Clean Air, Clean Water, and Clean Soil.

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox says that Santa Monica Council Member "Kevin McKeown" is a modern day superhero, and the residents of Santa Monica that stood up for the rights of the environment and residents’ rights to clean air and water are HEROS every one of them.

Time to say NO to Corporate Greed and Yes to Clean Air, Organic Soil, Clean Water, and the RIGHT to breath clean air, drink clean water.

More Resource links to this story

http://beforeitsnews.com/environment/2013/03/santa-monica-sustainability-bill-of-rights-law-passed-2464076.html

Port Townsend Washington Environmental Bill of Rights 

~ the TIME has Come.

More information Regarding the Port Townsend Paper Mill

 PortTownsendPaperMill.com
Owned and Operated by Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox

All written and Posted, alledged upon the knowledge and belief of Crystal Cox.

Senate Press Gallery has granted SCOTUSblog a press credential.

"Press credential We’re very pleased to say that the Senate Press Gallery has granted our reporter Lyle Denniston a press credential as a representative of SCOTUSblog.  The Supreme Court’s general practice, which we expect to apply in this case, is to recognize Senate credentials.  We are very grateful for the thoughtful consideration we received from everyone involved."

Source
http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/04/press-credential/

Remember when SCOTUSblog discussed getting a Press Credential in the Amicus Brief of the Crystal Cox Case, Obsidian Finance Group v. Crystal Cox ?

Lyle Denniston and the ScotusBlog issues of press pass in the Cox Amicus
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/133576894/ScotusBlogcom-Amicus-Brief-Regarding-Obsidian-Vs-Cox-Appeal

The Porn Industry's Dark Deeds, Control Over Women, Greed, and EVIL must be brought to the LIGHT. Stop Supporting Porn. Learn the Truth about the PORN Industry.

"Reel fantasies, real crimes"

"Andrea Dworkin describes how she, Catharine MacKinnon and Linda Lovelace battled to prove that pornographers were similar in kind to the Ku Klux Klan

In fall 1983 Catharine MacKinnon and I co-taught a course on pornography at the University of Minnesota law school, Minneapolis. We had spent the summer reading obscenity decisions, compiling essays on issues raised by pornography, and deciding which pornography our students would study. Not a course for the faint-hearted, it started off with Salo, the Marquis de Sade's 120 Days of Sodom and Snuff.

We selected 64 students, mostly women. Enrolment was open to liberal arts students and law students.

We were lobbied by activists to attend a zoning committee meeting at the city hall. The US pornography business above all concerns property: whose is worthless enough that politicians can get away with dumping commercial sex nearby? The answer in every city is the same: put porn establishments near the dwellings of people of colour and poor whites. Minneapolis is 96 per cent white, but the pornography outlets saturate neighbourhoods inhabited by American Indians and African Americans. For years, neighbourhood groups wanted fairer zoning laws. But even in progressive Minneapolis, pornography was not going to be zoned into wealthy, white areas.

MacKinnon and I made clear we would not support any zoning strategy. The community activists, it turned out, were not asking that: rather, they wanted to confront the hatred of women in pornography. Exposed to pornographic films and magazines over years of organising, they had developed a human-rights consciousness and we became the catalysts for its expression. Several of them testified to the zoning committee about pornography's brutality towards women. MacKinnon and Iconnected pornography to the low civil status of women.

A liberal Republican woman, Charlee Hoyt, proposed hiring MacKinnon and myself to draft civil-rights legislation that would recognise pornography's role in subordinating women, to organise hearings on the legislation, and to consult with the city council on pornography.

Before we had fully drafted our legislation, the Minnesota Civil Liberties Union denounced it, setting the tone for the political struggle ahead. While drafting the law and organising the hearings for the city council, MacKinnon and I were followed, threatened and demonised in cartoons and newspaper articles. Life became complicated. Nevertheless we seized the day.

First we drafted a statutory definition of pornography, concrete and precise so that it could not be misused. Next we created a cause of action (a right to sue) against traffickers in pornography for sex discrimination. We knew that we wanted a civil, not a criminal, law and that it had to be easy to understand so it would not be in the exclusive domain of lawyers but victim-friendly, something people could use.

Then we thought, What about Linda? Known as Linda Lovelace, she had been beaten to force her participation in Deep Throat, the most commercially successful pornographic film. MacKinnon and I had spent a year, along with Gloria Steinem among others, trying to frame a civil-rights lawsuit on Linda's behalf. She was raped, tortured, bought and sold, forced into pornography. Surely, if Linda's civil rights had not been violated, whose had?

Steinem pointed me to Linda's account of these events in her autobiographical book Ordeal. After reading it, I began to conceptualise the violence used against Linda as interrelated civil-rights injuries. I wanted to bring a lawsuit against these pornographers as if they were the Ku Klux Klan. I consulted MacKinnon. She thought that post-civil war equality statutes designed to get at the Klan might be applied to the pornographers who had coerced Linda. I also wanted the suit to target all the men who used Linda as a prostitute and the husband who pimped, beat, and raped her.

MacKinnon and I grilled Linda on every detail of the violence against her, including the gang rape that was her first experience of forced prostitution. In the end we were unable to bring the suit. We could find no way around the statute of limitations. Too much time had elapsed, even though Linda spent those years trying to get people to believe her. Today courts will sometimes extend the statute of limitation for sexual abuse. But back then I was beside myself, frustrated to death. "Don't worry,'' said Steinem, "this won't be for nothing.'' Two years later in Minneapolis we used everything we had learned in trying to sue for Linda.

So, we created a cause of action for coercion together with a list of facts that could not be used by a judge to throw the plaintiff out of court - such as the plaintiff's being a woman, or a prostitute, or being married to the pimp who exploited her. We also created a right to sue if someone had pornography forced on her (for instance, in sexual harassment in a job; or rape or battery in a marriage); and if someone experienced a sexual assault directly caused by pornography. In every case, the burden of proof was on the victim. But the standard of proof was a civil standard: not "beyond a reasonable doubt'' but whether "a preponderance of the evidence'' supported the plaintiff's claim.

In the public hearings that took place before the Minneapolis city council on December 12 and 13 1983, Linda testified that "every time someone watches (Deep Throat), they are watching me being raped''. Linda's lie-detector test was submitted as an exhibit to the city council. A victim of pornography-related child molestation said: "I want to tell you how pornography has affected my life, how I am fighting self-loathing, disgust and shame.'' A woman raped repeatedly in marriage said: "Pornography is not a fantasy. It was my life, reality ... He would read from the pornography like a textbook ... when he asked me to be bound, when he finally convinced me to do it, he read in a magazine how to tie the knots, and how to bind me in a way that I couldn't get out.'' A former prostitute testifying for a group of women who had been prostituted in Minneapolis said: "We were all introduced to prostitution through pornography. There were no exceptions in our group, and we were all under 18.'' A construction worker described pornography at her work site. It was, she said, "uncomfortable ... to go down there and have dinner and lunch with about 20 men, and here is me facing all these pictures''. An American Indian woman testified: "I was raped by two white men, and from the beginning they let me know that the rape of a 'squaw' by white men was practically honoured by white society. In fact, it had been made into a video game called 'Custer's Last Stand'. That's what they screamed in my face as they threw me to the ground - 'this is more fun than 'Custer's Last Stand'.'' The anti-pornography civil rights bill we drafted was passed by the Minneapolis city council on December 30 1983. The mayor vetoed it; a new city council passed the law again in 1984; the mayor vetoed it a second time. Meanwhile, similar legislation that we drafted was passed in Indianapolis, Indiana, in April 1984. Mayor William Hudnut signed the bill into law. One hour later, Indianapolis was sued by a group called the Media Coalition, which included the American Publishers Association, American Booksellers Association, and American Library Association.

It has taken 15 years to get these hearings published in the US. The Minneapolis hearings were distributed as photocopied samizdat. None of the subsequent hearings has been available in any form. Nothing makes clearer how the pornographers and those who defend them depend on the suppression of women's speech. For MacKinnon and me, the publication of these hearings honours those who dared to speak. But our debt to them will not be paid until they and all those they stand in for can use the law we drafted.

In Harm's Way. Andrea Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon, eds. Harvard University Press, March 1998."

Source of Above
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/103267.article

Linda Susan Boreman / Linda Lovelace Research Links

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Lovelace

"In 1980, Linda Boreman (who had appeared in the pornographic film Deep Throat as "Linda Lovelace") made public statements that her ex-husband Chuck Traynor had beaten and raped her, and violently coerced her into making that and other pornographic films. Boreman made her charges public for the press corps at a press conference, with Dworkin, feminist lawyer Catharine MacKinnon, and members of Women Against Pornography. After the press conference, Dworkin, MacKinnon,Gloria Steinem, and Boreman began discussing the possibility of using federal civil rights law to seek damages from Traynor and the makers of Deep Throat. Boreman was interested, but backed off after Steinem discovered that the statute of limitations for a possible suit had passed.^[38]

Dworkin and MacKinnon, however, continued to discuss civil rights litigation as a possible approach to combating pornography. In the fall of 1983, MacKinnon secured a one-semester appointment for Dworkin at the University of Minnesota, to teach a course in literature for the Women's Studies program and co-teach (with MacKinnon) an interdepartmental course on pornography, where they hashed out details of a civil rights approach. With encouragement from community activists in southMinneapolis, the Minneapolis city government hired Dworkin and MacKinnon to draft an antipornography civil rights ordinance as an amendment to the Minneapolis city civil rights ordinance.

The amendment defined pornography as a civil rights violation against women, and allowed women who claimed harm from pornography to sue the producers and distributors in civil court for damages. The law was passed twice by the Minneapolis city council but vetoed by Mayor Don Fraser, who considered the wording of the ordinance to be too vague.^[39] Another version of the ordinance passed in Indianapolis, Indiana in 1984, but overturned as unconstitutional by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the case American Booksellers v. Hudnut. Dworkin continued to support the civil rights approach in her writing and activism, and supported anti-pornography feminists who organized later campaigns in Cambridge, Massachusetts (1985) and Bellingham, Washington (1988) to pass versions of the ordinance by voter initiative.^[40]

Source and More
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin

More Research Links

http://www.biography.com/people/linda-lovelace-262763

http://lindasusanboreman.blogspot.com/2012/01/facts-you-never-knew-about-linda.html

http://lindasusanboreman.blogspot.com/

http://www.wnd.com/2005/01/28595/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Traynor

Andrea Dworkin

Andrea Rita Dworkin was an American radical feminist and writer best known for her criticism of pornography, which she argued was linked to rape and other forms of violence against women. Wikipedia

Born: September 26, 1946, Camden
Died: April 9, 2005, Washington, D.C

Research Links

http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin

http://www.andreadworkin.net/memorial/

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/a/andrea_dworkin.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45447-2005Apr11.html

http://andreadworkin.com/audio/

http://archive.org/details/pra-AZ1413

http://archive.org/details/pra-KZ4064

http://archive.org/details/dn2005-0623

http://archive.org/details/dn2005-0623_vid

"In 1997, Dworkin published a collection of her speeches and articles from the 1990s in Life and Death: Unapologetic Writings on the Continuing War on Women, including a long autobiographical essay on her life as a writer, and articles on violence against women, pornography, prostitution, Nicole Brown Simpson, the use of rape during the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Montreal massacre, Israel, and the gender politics of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Reviewing Life and Death in The New Republic, philosopher Martha Nussbaum criticizes voices in contemporary feminism for denouncing Catharine MacKinnon and Dworkin as "man-haters," and argues that First Amendment critiques of Dworkin's civil ordinance proposal against pornography "are not saying anything intellectually respectable," for the First Amendment "has never covered all speech: bribery, threats, extortionate offers, misleading advertising, perjury, and unlicensed medical advice are all unprotected." Nussbaum adds that Dworkin has focused attention on the proper moral target by making harm associated with subordination, not obscenity, civilly actionable.

Nevertheless, Nussbaum opposes the adoption of Dworkin's pornography ordinance because it (1) fails to distinguish between moral and legal violations, (2) fails to demonstrate a causal relationship between pornography and specific harm, (3) holds author of printed images or words responsible for others' behavior, (4) grants censorial power to the judiciary (which may be directed against feminist scholarship), and (5) erases the contextual considerations within which sex takes place. More broadly, Nussbaum faults Dworkin for (1) occluding economic injustice through an "obsessive focus on sexual subordination," (2) reproducing objectification in reducing her interlocutors to their abuse, and (3) refusing reconciliation in favor of "violent extralegal resistance against male violence.]"

Source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin

Catharine MacKinnon Research Links

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catharine_MacKinnon

http://www.makers.com/catharine-mackinnon

http://www.pbs.org/thinktank/transcript215.html

http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/index.html?id=734

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/c/catharine_mackinnon.html

http://www.cddc.vt.edu/feminism/mackinnon.html

Alexandra aka Monica Foster interviews Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Technology Founder and one of the Inventors of the iViewit Technology regarding the Stealing of the iViewit Technology.

Monica Foster interviewed by Tania Fiolleau about the Porn Industry. Monica Foster Porn Industry Whistleblower interviewed by Former Madam Tania Fiolleau of Save The Women Ministry.

Tania Fiolleau of Save The Women Ministry helping women out of porn, explaining the spiritual aspect of being in the Porn Business.

Part 1 
Tania Fiolleau Interviewing Porn Industry Insider / Porn Industry Whistleblower Monica Foster.





Part 2 
Tania Fiolleau Interviewing Porn Industry Insider / Porn Industry Whistleblower Monica Foster.





The Adult Industry Breaks your Spirit, Holds you in the Industry with Drugs and Violence. Whistle Blowers are gang stalked, internet mobbed, stalked, harassed and under constant threats and retaliation. Exiting Porn is nearly impossible. Speak Up, help those who want to Exit Porn, do so safely.

STOP Human Trafficking. STOP Supporting the Porn Industry.

Tania Fiolleau Research Links

Helping Women to Exit the Porn Industry

http://www.savethewomen.ca/

http://www.savethewomen.ca/index.php/about/

"Save The Women Ministry International is faith-based and dedicated to reaching out to adult industry victims offering emotional, financial and transitional support. We largely focus on reaching out to the adult film industry & prostituted & human trafficking victims abroad offering education and resources to victims of sex trafficking and violence in the workplace. Save The Women Ministry International also reaches out to those struggling with pornography addiction offering education and large doses of truth to recover.

Men and women addicted to porn need to hear it straight from the women who were there.
Save The Women Ministry also works to combat community deterioration due to pornography and sex trafficking through attempts to educate legislation about the illegally operating porn industry, to educate the general public and to toughen laws to protect women and children from modern-day slavery.

Warning: This web site contains large doses of truth about the sex industry for purposes of education. If you are 17 years of age or under please ask your parents for permission to view this web site, although statistics show the largest group for viewing online pornography is ages 12 – 17.

Because of the huge epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases, illegal drug use and violence toward adult industry workers, Tania. Fiolleau Founded Save The Women Ministry International in 2009.

Tania Fiolleau a former human trafficking survivor of major abuse in the sex industry and former madam of four brothels and well over 500 prostitutes was diagnosed with Severe Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Through inner healing and redemption she found in Jesus Christ Tania has now become a major voice abroad defending the rights of victims across the globe."

Source of quote and more
http://www.savethewomen.ca/index.php/vision-and-mission/




"If I were to ask anyone, which of the known addictions he found most repulsive, his answer would probably be, “drug addiction.”  He would perhaps reflect the opinion of the majority. However, if we look at the afflictions that we can observe every day, many would turn us to revulsion.  Diseases, such as cancer, muscular dystrophy, influenza, and the rest of them, metamorphose the body into something we have a hard time understanding. Most of us are lucky to be on the outside looking in.

Nevertheless, some of us suffer from a much more devastating disease than those I just mentioned. This affliction does not transform your body, but it kills your soul. It is something that we cannot beat with medication, or surgery, or even cure. Only three percent of the “patients” diagnosed will escape the everlasting torment if we don’t do something about it. Ninety-seven percent will die at the hands of evil thoughts torment and despair.  Yet, some have deliberately contracted this disease and many were forced into it. Either way it is not a disease that one would want… a walk down sex lane.

Do you really believe that anyone force all of these woman to take her clothes off and have sex with a man she has never met before and will probably never see again? Yes and no. Some women are forced into prostitution through human trafficking and pimps, others through circumstances, the customs, or the station in life impelling her to take the plunge into the deep, bottomless pit of prostitution.

In most communities of this world, women are not born to be prostituted but for many it is their destiny. Others are qualified as “escorts” or “companions” for the night or even for just an hour.  Whether we call them “whores”, “prostitutes” or “escorts” or “human traffic victims”, they are women, men and children who have less than a 3% chance of ever getting out.

I was one of them. I had to make a choice. It was either that or risk losing my sons to a brute that very easily could have killed my eldest son and myself  in a fit of rage if I weren’t able to stop him by getting custody of both my children.  Believe me; my eyes were wide-open when I stepped in the first brothel I had ever seen in my life. The devil took me by the hand then and showed me the color of money – lots of it. I could earn four-day’s pay in an hour. With that money, I could buy the services of a good lawyer and get custody of my two sons."

Source and More
http://www.savethewomen.ca/index.php/upcoming-book-souled-out/


Tania Fiolleau YouTube Channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/savethewomen1